Supporting gut health with medicinal cannabis in people with advanced cancer: potential benefits and challenges.

The side effects of cancer therapy continue to cause significant health and cost burden to the patient, their friends and family, and governments. A major barrier in the way in which these side effects are managed is the highly siloed mentality that results in a fragmented approach to symptom control. Increasingly, it is appreciated that many symptoms are manifestations of common underlying pathobiology, with changes in the gastrointestinal environment a key driver for many symptom sequelae. Breakdown of the mucosal barrier (mucositis) is a common and early side effect of many anti-cancer agents, known to contribute (in part) to a range of highly burdensome symptoms such as diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, infection, malnutrition, fatigue, depression, and insomnia. Here, we outline a rationale for how, based on its already documented effects on the gastrointestinal microenvironment, medicinal cannabis could be used to control mucositis and prevent the constellation of symptoms with which it is associated. We will provide a brief update on the current state of evidence on medicinal cannabis in cancer care and outline the potential benefits (and challenges) of using medicinal cannabis during active cancer therapy.

Framework for Implementing Individualised Dosing of Anti-Cancer Drugs in Routine Care: Overcoming the Logistical Challenges.

Precision medicine in oncology involves identifying the 'right drug', at the 'right dose', for the right person. Currently, many orally administered anti-cancer drugs, particularly kinase inhibitors (KIs), are prescribed at a standard fixed dose. Identifying the right dose remains one of the biggest challenges to optimal patient care. Recently the Precision Dosing Group established the Accurate Dosing of Anti-cancer Patient-centred Therapies (ADAPT) Program to address individualised dosing; thus, use existing anti-cancer drugs more safely and efficiently. In this paper, we outline our framework, based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, with a simple 6-step process and strategies which have led to the successful implementation of the ADAPT program in South Australia. Implementation strategies in our 6-step process involve: (1) Evaluate the evidence and identify the cancer drugs: Literature review, shadowing other experts, establishing academic partnerships, adaptability/flexibility; (2) Establishment of analytical equipment for drug assays for clinical purposes: assessment for readiness, accreditation, feasibility, obtaining formal commitments, quality assurance to all stakeholders; (3) Clinical preparation and education: educational material, conducted educational meetings, involve opinion leaders, use of mass media, promote network weaving, conduct ongoing training; (4) Blood collection, sample preparation and analyses: goods received procedures, critical control points (transport time); (5) Interpret and release results with recommendations: facilitate the relay of clinical data to providers; (6) Clinical application: providing ongoing consultation, identify early adopters, identify, and prepare champions. These strategies were selected from the 73 implementation strategies outlined in the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. The ADAPT program currently provides routine plasma concentrations for patients on several orally administered drugs in South Australia and is currently in its evaluation phase soon to be published. Our newly established framework could provide great potential and opportunities to advance individualised dosing of oral anti-cancer drugs in routine clinical care.

Understanding the Risk of Drug Interactions Between Ritonavir-Containing COVID-19 Therapies and Small-Molecule Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE: The introduction of COVID-19 therapies containing ritonavir has markedly expanded the scope of use for this medicine. As a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor, the use of ritonavir is associated with a high drug interaction risk. There are currently no data to inform clinician regarding the likely magnitude and duration of interaction between ritonavir-containing COVID-19 therapies and small-molecule kinase inhibitors (KIs) in patients with cancer. METHODS: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to conduct virtual clinical trials with a parallel group study design in the presence and absence of ritonavir (100 mg twice daily for 5 days). The magnitude and time course of changes in KI exposure when coadministered with ritonavir was evaluated as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Dosing of ritonavir resulted in a > 2-fold increase in steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximal concentration for six of the 10 KIs. When the KI was coadministered with ritonavir, dose reductions to between 10% and 75% of the original dose were required to achieve an area under the plasma concentration-time curve within 1.25-fold of the value in the absence of ritonavir. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this study provides the first data to assist clinicians' understanding of the drug interaction risk associated with administering ritonavir-containing COVID-19 therapies to patients with cancer who are currently being treated with KIs. These data may support clinicians to make more informed dosing decisions for patients with cancer undergoing treatment with KIs who require treatment with ritonavir-containing COVID-19 antiviral therapies.

Plasma concentration guided dosing of drugs used for the treatment of childhood leukaemias: protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Childhood leukaemia is the most common type of cancer in children and represents among 25% of the diagnoses in children <15 years old. Childhood survival rates have significantly improved within the last 40 years due to a rapid advancement in therapeutic interventions. However, in high-risk groups, survival rates remain poor. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data of cancer medications in children are limited and thus current dosing regimens are based on studies with small sample sizes. In adults, large variability in PK is observed and dose individualisation (plasma concentration guided dosing) has been associated with improved clinical outcomes; whether this is true for children is still unknown. This provides an opportunity to explore this strategy in children to potentially reduce toxicities and ensure optimal dosing. This paper will provide a protocol to systematically review studies that have used dose individualisation of drugs used in the treatment of childhood leukaemias. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic review methodology will be applied to identify, select and extract data from published plasma guided dosing studies conducted in a paediatric leukaemia cohort. Databases (eg, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Cochrane) and clinical trial registries (CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN) will be used to perform the systematic literature search (up until February 2021). Only full empirical studies will be included, with primary clinical outcomes (progression-free survival, toxicities, minimal residual disease status, complete cytogenetic response, partial cytogenetic response and major molecular response) being used to decide whether the study will be included. The quality of included studies will be undertaken, with a subgroup analysis where appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review will not require ethics approval as there will not be collection of primary data. Findings of this review will be made available through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. Gaps will be identified in current literature to inform future-related research. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021225045.

Cost-effectiveness of oral anticancer drugs and associated individualised dosing approaches in patients with cancer: protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticancer drugs (OADs) have rapidly expanded with more than 70 OADs targeting several molecular targets. Many of the OADs exert an exposure-response relationship but still, a 'one-size fits-all' dose is used, ignoring interindividual variability. Several of these OADs share similar mechanisms of actions and thus target the same cancer and has resulted in a substantial research focus on comparing the health benefit of each. However, significantly less is known about the cost-benefit associated with OADs. This paper will provide a protocol to systematically review studies that have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of OADs and their associated individualised dosing interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic review methodology will be applied to identify, select and extract data from published economic evaluation (costs and outcomes/benefits) studies of OADs and their associated individualised dosing interventions. Bibliographic databases (eg, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE) will be used to perform the systematic literature search (between 1 January 2000 and October 2020). Only full economic evaluations will be included, but no restrictions on study outcomes will be applied. The quality of included primary studies will be assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist for reporting economic evaluations. Studies with low-quality evidence will be excluded. A narrative synthesis of the results from the included studies will be undertaken, with a subgroup analysis where appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review will not require ethics approval as there will not be any collection of primary data. Findings of this review will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at workshops or conferences and sharing through a media release. Findings from this review will provide evidence to direct and inform policy-makers where cost-neutral strategies may be effective or where dose individualising strategies may be economically beneficial. Additionally, gaps will be identified in the current literature to inform future-related research. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020218170. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: The online version of this article contains supplemental material, which is available to authorised users.

Computational Treatment Simulations to Assess the Need for Personalized Tamoxifen Dosing in Breast Cancer Patients of Different Biogeographical Groups.

Tamoxifen is used worldwide to treat estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. It is extensively metabolized, and minimum steady-state concentrations of its metabolite endoxifen (CSS,min ENDX) >5.97 ng/mL have been associated with favorable outcome. Endoxifen formation is mediated by the enzyme CYP2D6, and impaired CYP2D6 function has been associated with lower CSS,min ENDX. In the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study proposing the target concentration, 20% of patients showed subtarget CSS,min ENDX at tamoxifen standard dosing. CYP2D6 allele frequencies vary largely between populations, and as 87% of the patients in the WHEL study were White, little is known about the risk for subtarget CSS,min ENDX in other populations. Applying pharmacokinetic simulations, this study investigated the risk for subtarget CSS,min ENDX at tamoxifen standard dosing and the need for dose individualization in nine different biogeographical groups with distinct CYP2D6 allele frequencies. The high variability in CYP2D6 allele frequencies amongst the biogeographical groups resulted in an up to three-fold difference in the percentages of patients with subtarget CSS,min ENDX. Based on their CYP2D6 allele frequencies, East Asian breast cancer patients were identified as the population for which personalized, model-informed precision dosing would be most beneficial (28% of patients with subtarget CSS,min ENDX).

Exploring the Use of Serum-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles as Liquid Biopsy to Study the Induction of Hepatic Cytochromes P450 and Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides.

Liver-derived small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), prepared from small sets of banked serum samples using a novel two-step protocol, were deployed as liquid biopsy to study the induction of cytochromes P450 (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP2D6) and organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP1B1 and OATP1B3) during pregnancy (nonpregnant (T0), first, second, and third (T3) trimester women; N = 3 each) and after administration of rifampicin (RIF) to healthy male subjects. Proteomic analysis revealed induction (mean fold-increase, 90% confidence interval) of sEV CYP3A4 after RIF 300 mg × 7 days (3.5, 95% CI = 2.5-4.5, N = 4, P = 0.029) and 600 mg × 14 days (3.7, 95% CI = 2.1-6.0, N = 5, P = 0.018) consistent with the mean oral midazolam area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) ratio in the same subjects (0.28, 95% CI = 0.22-0.34, P < 0.0001; and 0.17, 95% CI = 0.13-0.22, P < 0.0001). Compared with CYP3A4, liver sEV CYP3A5 protein (subjects genotyped CYP3A5*1/*3) was weakly induced (≤ 1.5-fold). It was also possible to measure liver sEV-catalyzed dextromethorphan (DEX) O-demethylation to dextrorphan (DXO), correlated with sEV CYP2D6 expression (r = 0.917, P = 0.0001; N = 10) and 3-hour plasma DXO-to-DEX concentration ratio (r = 0.843, P = 0.002, N = 10), and show that CYP2D6 was not induced by RIF. Nonparametric analysis of liver sEV revealed significantly higher CYP3A4 (3.2-fold, P = 0.003) and CYP2D6 (3.7-fold, P = 0.03) protein expression in T3 vs. T0 women. In contrast, expression of both OATPs in liver sEV was unaltered by RIF administration and pregnancy.

Simulation-Based Assessment of the Impact of Non-Adherence on Endoxifen Target Attainment in Different Tamoxifen Dosing Strategies.

Tamoxifen is widely used in breast cancer treatment and minimum steady-state concentrations of its active metabolite endoxifen (CSS,min ENDX) above 5.97 ng/mL have been associated with favourable disease outcome. Yet, about 20% of patients do not reach target CSS,min ENDX applying conventional tamoxifen dosing. Moreover, 4-75% of patients are non-adherent, resulting in worse disease outcomes. Assuming complete adherence, we previously showed model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) to be superior to conventional and CYP2D6-guided dosing in minimising the proportion of patients with subtarget CSS,min ENDX. Given the high non-adherence rate in long-term tamoxifen therapy, this study investigated the impact of non-adherence on CSS,min ENDX target attainment in different dosing strategies. We show that MIPD allows to account for the expected level of non-adherence (here: up to 2 missed doses/week): increasing the MIPD target threshold from 5.97 ng/mL to 9 ng/mL (the lowest reported CSS,min ENDX in CYP2D6 normal metabolisers) as a safeguard resulted in the lowest interindividual variability and proportion of patients with subtarget CSS,min ENDX even in non-adherent patients. This is a significant improvement to conventional and CYP2D6-guided dosing. Adding a fixed increment to the originally selected dose is not recommended, since it inflates interindividual variability.

Combining Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacokinetic Modelling Deconvolutes Physiological and Environmental Sources of Variability in Clozapine Exposure.

Background: Clozapine is a key antipsychotic drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia but exhibits highly variable pharmacokinetics and a propensity for serious adverse effects. Currently, these challenges are addressed using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This study primarily sought to (i) verify the importance of covariates identified in a prior clozapine population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model in the absence of environmental covariates using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling, and then to (ii) evaluate the performance of the popPK model as an adjunct or alternative to TDM-guided dosing in an active TDM population. Methods: A popPK model incorporating age, metabolic activity, sex, smoking status and weight was applied to predict clozapine trough concentrations (Cmin) in a PBPK-simulated population and an active TDM population comprising 142 patients dosed to steady state at Flinders Medical Centre in Adelaide, South Australia. Post hoc analyses were performed to deconvolute the impact of physiological and environmental covariates in the TDM population. Results: Analysis of PBPK simulations confirmed age, cytochrome P450 1A2 activity, sex and weight as physiological covariates associated with variability in clozapine Cmin (R2 = 0.7698; p = 0.0002). Prediction of clozapine Cmin using a popPK model based on these covariates accounted for <5% of inter-individual variability in the TDM population. Post hoc analyses confirmed that environmental covariates accounted for a greater proportion of the variability in clozapine Cmin in the TDM population. Conclusions: Variability in clozapine exposure was primarily driven by environmental covariates in an active TDM population. Pharmacokinetic modelling can be used as an adjunct to TDM to deconvolute sources of variability in clozapine exposure.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs.

PURPOSE: This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted. RESULTS: OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy. CONCLUSION: Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.

Effect of early adverse events on response and survival outcomes of advanced melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib or vemurafenib plus cobimetinib: A pooled analysis of clinical trial data.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of early adverse events on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response within a pooled secondary analysis of participants treated with first-line vemurafenib or vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in the clinical trials BRIM3 and coBRIM. The study included 583 participants who received vemurafenib monotherapy and 247 who received vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Adverse events requiring vemurafenib/cobimetinib dose adjustment within the first 28 days of therapy were significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]: dose reduced/interrupted = 0.79 [0.65-0.96]; drug withdrawn = 1.18 [0.71-1.96]; p = 0.032), PFS (HR [95% CI]: dose reduced/interrupted = 0.82 [0.67-0.99]; drug withdrawn = 1.58 [0.97-2.58]; p = 0.017) and objective response (odds ratio (OR) [95% CI]: dose reduced/interrupted = 1.35 [0.99-1.85]; drug withdrawn = 0.17 [0.06-0.43]; p = <0.001). Arthralgia occurring within the first 28 days of vemurafenib or vemurafenib plus cobimetinib therapy was also significantly associated with favourable OS (p = 0.026), PFS (p = 0.042) and objective response (p = 0.047).

Use of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Identify Physiological and Molecular Characteristics Driving Variability in Axitinib Exposure: A Fresh Approach to Precision Dosing in Oncology.

Axitinib is a second-generation small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor. An axitinib steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCSS ) >300 ng/mL/hr is associated with superior progression-free and overall survival. This study sought to characterize the physiological and molecular characteristics driving variability in axitinib AUCSS using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to identify exposure biomarkers for this drug. The capacity to predict subjects likely to fail to achieve an axitinib AUCSS >300 ng/mL/hr was evaluated as a secondary outcome. A full physiologically based pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanistic absorption was developed and verified for axitinib in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration Guidance using Simcyp (Version 17.1). This model was used to simulate axitinib exposure over 7 days with twice-daily dosing (5 mg) in a cohort of 1000 virtual cancer patients. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to identify patient characteristics associated with differences in axitinib exposure. A multivariable linear regression model incorporating hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 abundance, albumin concentration, hepatic CYP1A2 abundance, hepatic CYP2C19 abundance, and intestinal CYP2C19 abundance provided robust prediction of axitinib AUCSS (R2 = 0.890; P < .001). By accounting for these variables, it was possible to identify subjects who would fail to achieve an effective axitinib AUCSS with a specificity of 88.7% and a sensitivity of 92.6%. Variability in axitinib AUCSS is primarily driven by differences in hepatic CYP3A4 abundance and albumin concentration. Consideration of these 2 characteristic is likely to be sufficient to individualize axitinib dosing.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Identify Physiological and Molecular Characteristics Driving Variability in Drug Exposure.

Prospectively defining the physiological and molecular characteristics most likely driving between-subject variability (BSV) in drug exposure provides the opportunity to inform the assessment of biomarkers to account for this variability. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was constructed and verified for dabrafenib. This model was then used to evaluate the physiological and molecular characteristics driving BSV in dabrafenib exposure. The capacity to discriminate a steady-state dabrafenib trough concentration >48 ng/mL was also evaluated. The mean simulated/observed ratios for the parameters describing dabrafenib exposure in single-dose, multiple-dose, and drug-drug interaction studies were between 0.78 and 1.23. Multivariable analysis indicated that consideration of baseline weight, body mass index, and CYP2C8, CYP3A4, and P-gp abundance strongly predicts steady-state dabrafenib trough concentration above 48 ng/mL (ROC AUC = 0.94; accuracy = 86%). This is the first study to use a verified PBPK model to identify baseline physiological and molecular characteristics driving BSV in drug exposure.

Kinase inhibitor pharmacokinetics: comprehensive summary and roadmap for addressing inter-individual variability in exposure.

INTRODUCTION: Small molecule protein kinase inhibitors (KIs) are a class of drugs with complex and unconventional physiochemical and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Cytochrome P450 mediated metabolism and transporter-mediated uptake and efflux are important processes that determine KI disposition and exposure. Areas covered: We provide an overview of KI pharmacology, with a comprehensive summary of KI physiochemical and pharmacokinetic properties and description of the major sources of variability in KI pharmacokinetics focusing on common pathways involved in determining exposure. We also consider the strategies proposed to optimize KI dosing, appraise the current evidence for their use and analyze the challenges and knowledge gaps for KI dose optimization. Expert opinion: A number of strategies to optimize KI dosing have been proposed, but evidence underpinning their use is limited. The major challenge for optimized KI dosing is the development of high-quality evidence to demonstrate a significant improvement in therapeutic outcomes and /or reduction in adverse events through appropriately designed trials in a setting where the limited KI prescribing restricts capacity to undertake prospective randomized studies. If precision KI dosing can facilitate a fraction of the reported observational benefits, then substantial gains in patient outcomes will be derived in a cost-effective manner.

A novel approach for the simultaneous quantification of 18 small molecule kinase inhibitors in human plasma: A platform for optimised KI dosing.

Small molecule kinase inhibitors (KIs) are a rapidly expanding class of narrow therapeutic index antineoplastic drugs that exhibit substantial inter-individual variability in exposure. This manuscript describes a novel approach for the quantification of 18 KIs in plasma, providing a platform that is unparalleled in terms of scope for the assessment of KI therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and facilitating pharmacokinetic studies with KIs. Following the addition of a panel of four deuterated internal standards, plasma samples were prepared by solvent precipitation with acidified methanol. Analytes were separated on a Waters ACQUITY™ T3 HSS C18 analytical column (150×2.1mm, 1.8µm particle size) by linear gradient elution, with subsequent detection by time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Time-of-flight data were collected in wide pass mode, with selected ion (pseudo-MRM) spectra extracted at the precursor m/z of analytes in ESI+ mode. The analytical performance of this approach in terms of specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision range, quantification limit and detection limit meet all criteria for an analytical platform for the quantification of drugs. This approach was developed, validated and reported in accordance with the 2015 version of the FDA guidance for industry on 'analytical procedures are methods validation for drugs and biologics' facilitating direct application as a clinical trials platform.